The State Held Hostage...
Budget Stalemate Day 51
"[GOP] party leaders offered a starting point for budget negotiations.
They proposed reforms in budgeting that were immediately kissed off."
-George Skelton, LA Times, June 23, 2008
FThe Daily Dave!E
News that Amuses, Annoys
and
Occasionally Frustrates Dave!
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
WIDE OPEN WEDNESDAY
Celebrating AMERICAN history
and
AMERICAN accomplishment EVERYDAY
SMOKERS: KEEP YOUR BUTTS IN YOUR CAR
Trivia Question: Who said on Nov 4, 2008, "I'm, a believer in knowing what you're doing when you apply for a job. And I think that if I were to seriously consider running on a national ticket, I would essentially have to start now, before having served a day in the Senate. There might be some people who are comfortable with that, but I'm not one of those people." (A: The very words of the Blessed Leader)
And an interesting thought about the leftist mentality that I heard recently: Whenever anyone who is NOT a liberal succeeds at something, it's because they somehow cheated
From the eMail bag:
Now, for my long tirade.
I believe appx 2 billion plus goes out of CA alone to Mexico on an annual basis. There has to be some way of controlling this. How much of this money do you think is actually taxed and is truly net funds from employment?
They are encouraged by their government to come here, work and send the money home to put in Mexico's economy rather than in California's.
1) They get all that CA has to offer: Medi-cal, subsidized housing, WIC for their many offspring - this leads to Welfare because they are getting WIC. Foodstamps, etc......
2) In-state tuition (which our children do not even get to take advantage of)
3) Free lunch programs in school. Specialized care in school to catch them up with English, even though many of their households continue to use Spanish which does not help the situation.
So, most are offered and use ALL of the the states programs for low income people, down to the special programs for "Expecting Mexican women that need assistance" (not exact in verbiage, but it was an option on the state link as a topic line. Then they most likely work off the books and send that money back to Mexico to better their economy.
Our tax dollars are paying to support these people and Mexico's economy benefits from it. It's not going back into our economy because anything spent here is just an off-set to tax dollars they are receiving. Something is definitely wrong with this picture. No wonder our budget is so screwed up year after year.
Maybe we can start by making it a little more difficult for them to simply transfer the money home. The transfer stations are everywhere; in liquor stores, 7-11's, supermarkets, etc.
We need to find a way to regulate what funds flow to Mexico. Identify if it's coming from somebody that has employment and is paying taxes and NOT collecting state aid. If they're collecting any kind of aid from tax dollars, their money should not be going home to boost their economy and not back into ours.
Their jackass president has the nards to actually fine CA residents that are crossing the border to fill their gas tanks during our gas crisis here. Their gas is subsidized. Although he encourages his people to cross the border, even helps them find ways to do this to get all of our subsidies.
This whole thing makes me sick to my stomach. If I am correct and the number is 2 billion plus annually - then it needs to stop. That would greatly help our budget in coming years. And hey, if they can't send the money back home... why come here? :) If it's legally earned and has been taxed and they are paying from net dollars as mentioned above, then that's when it's ok to transfer the money home. Operative word being home.
What A Shock.... Obama is planning to portray McCain as Bush III
Hmmm.. somebody went to the same School of Political Campaigns that Barry Obama went to. If you don't understand the reference, then just tell yourself that you are voting against Obama because of his lapel pin or church or middle name and don't worry yourself about the real issues with him.
The Soviets Russians are "going home" with Humvees and Prisoners.
I don't want this to sound negative, but.... today marks an anniversary that is being (rightfully) celebrated by the County. One year without a gang related homicide investigation for the Sheriffs Department. Now, again, it's good, but it doesn't mean what it implies.
My favorite Modesto Bee Community Columnist weighs in on the roads in Modesto.
Turns out that people are using the ER for their Primary Care. Why? Of course, they don't have insurance. Nobody asks why not, but why would that matter?
So.. two nights of Clinton and a Jimmy Carter speech at the Dems Convention.... this actually might be worth watching (although not for the reasons that they think)
A Judge has blocked the 10% Medi-Cal cuts. Great... have him go out and raise the money to pay for it. Oh wait, he'll just appoint a receiver.
What will the Democrat Party Platform be on Energy? Will it match up with Nancy Pelosi's stand?


Daily Dave! Morning Briefing
So I hate to do this because it’s one of those things that I try not to do. I learned a long time ago that it is supposed to be one of the worst things you can do and through experience I learned the hard way that it really is bad, especially in a relationship. But here goes….
I told you so.
Back in June I wrote an Insider newsletter in which I postulated that newly “discovered” right to gay marriage would be used as a bludgeon and that eventually the so-called “gay rights” would trump your religious rights. In fact, I wrote these words:
Many of us have argued from the beginning that Gay Marriage would be a slippery slope leading inexorably to polygamy, bigamy, pedophiliac marriage and any other type of "marriage" that can be legally justified. I realized early on that the slope is seriously slippery, but it quickly went in a direction that I had intellectually understood, but was not really willing to believe. As it turns out, the whole issue of Gay Marriage is in fact, an assault on the Fist Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
All of that, established back in 1791, and yet now today, the very existence of Gay Marriage appears to overturn all of the very first freedom guaranteed in the Bill of Rights and enshrined in national belief from the day that the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock. How, you may ask?
We are already seeing cases before the California Supreme Court where a Physician who refused to artificially inseminate a lesbian couple as against his beliefs has been sued. Despite the fact that he made efforts to obtain for the couple another doctor who would perform the procedure (and based on the outcome it appears that he did so) and the offer he made of post-natal care, he is still be skewered on the basis of his religious beliefs.
In a country where those who hold pacifist beliefs based on religion are for the most part excused from service in combat roles of the US Military, and in more recent years even from the military at all, we now see that ordinary everyday professionals in various lines of work are being told that their right to freedom of religion and the free expression thereof is being trumped by the "right" to gay marriage.
I received numerous eMails explaining to me that I was everything from overreacting to outright wrong, and in the spirit of not wanting to get into flame eMail wars, I bit my keyboard and just let it ride.
Ha! Didn’t take as long as I thought it would, but now we learn from our esteemed Supreme Court that you CAN be forced to violate your particular religious views in order to maintain or I suppose fulfill “gay rights.”
So like I said would happen, yesterday the California Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Christian Doctors who refused to artificially inseminate lesbian couples violated the States Anti-Discriminatory laws.
That’s right, their religious beliefs and convictions are now discriminatory. You can read that as: their religious beliefs are now illegal.
So Prop 8 is coming up on the November ballot, and those of us with religious convictions and beliefs are wondering if our vote will mean anything at all.
I hate to say it, but I told you so….
The State Held Hostage...
Budget Stalemate Day 50
"[GOP] party leaders offered a starting point for budget negotiations.
They proposed reforms in budgeting that were immediately kissed off."
-George Skelton, LA Times, June 23, 2008
FThe Daily Dave!E
News that Amuses, Annoys
and
Occasionally Frustrates Dave!
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Celebrating AMERICAN history
and
AMERICAN accomplishment EVERYDAY
SMOKERS: KEEP YOUR BUTTS IN YOUR CAR
Trivia Question: Who said on Nov 4, 2008*, "I'm, a believer in knowing what you're doing when you apply for a job. And I think that if I were to seriously consider running on a national ticket, I would essentially have to start now, before having served a day in the Senate. There might be some people who are comfortable with that, but I'm not one of those people."
From the eMail bag:
The liberals believe that dumping more money on the problem will cure it. If we directed more money towards our schools than our prisons the idea is we wouldn’t have a prison overcrowding problem in California and the US. It doesn’t matter how much money is dumped into the school system, it won’t work till there is a proper learning environment. There has to be discipline and respect for teachers and authority and the first thing that has to be done is kick the lawyers out of the mix. Liberalism and lawyers have destroyed our public school systems. We have to rein still proper dress and grooming standards. We can’t have our daughters going to school dressed like something you would see standing on a corner flagging down cars in the red-light district. We can’t have our sons going to school looking like something left over from the 60s with their pants falling off or a gang banger. I heard on news that in a school system back east that if a student violates the dress code they have to wear a prison jump suit the rest of the day. Sounds like a good idea. My girlfriend started her 28th year last week teaching PE/ life time fitness at a high school east of Sacramento. She loved it when she started but with the changes in students and administrative support over the years she hates it now and can’t wait to get out. That is true for a lot of teachers. A couple years ago I asked how her day went and her response was, ”Well, nobody called me a “B%#$@” today!” She gets called the “B” word on a semi-regular basis. Between getting called names and breaking up fights it makes for a real great working environment. I think that is pretty shocking and reflective of the state of our school systems. Last week, the first week, a student threw gum at her twice striking her in the head. The first time she ignored it trying not to disrupt the class but the second time she couldn’t ignore it and had to act. He just got a slap on the hand. Teachers spend too much time dealing with the dirt bags that they loose valuable time with the good students. The other problem is lack of support and involvement from the parents and them believing the kid over the teacher. Most of the kids and parents aren’t that way but enough are to upset the apple cart. Overall though more discipline, respect and a stronger drive to learn and succeed are needed to put our schools back on the right track.
I grew up in Utah. In a strange way, I am more or less glad to be out of the place, mainly because it's a weird place in that "Back to the Future" kind of way. Politics in Utah is it's own animal, and in this case, you can see why. It is amusing that in "conservative" Utah, Democrats are forced to turn to Jesus for endorsements. For the record, in my humble opinion, Jesus doesn't really care all that much.Daily Dave! Morning Briefing
It’s a pretty well known Dave! Diamond factoid that I am not a big basketball fan and especially NOT an NBA fan. The game lost its “team” aspect a long time ago, and even NBA Commissioner David Stern has taken to describing the game as being like jazz music – pure improvisation as opposed to actual teamwork. You’ve heard me say it before, but I have long though that Michael Jordan ruined the NBA. Nor am I a huge Summer Olympics fan, I prefer the winter games, but the games always have their exciting moments.
One of the moments of the film Miracle, the story of the 1980 US Olympic Ice Hockey team is the point at which Coach Herb Brooks tells his team of prima donna college athletes, but not quite good enough international level players that they had better realize that the name on the front of their sweaters is more important than the name on the back. You can sense that point when each of the players begins to realize that what they are playing for is more than the self. There are no contracts here, no endorsement deals, no superstars. This is about playing for the team and the country. We all know how that story ended and I am amazed that even now, nearly thirty years later, the guys on that team still choke up and still recall with pride at how they represented their country.
So while we watched over the weekend two of the three Presidential Candidates go to church we were left to wonder what happened to that spirit of understanding that country is more than self. It was clear to me, watching and listening to answers that one candidate understands that the country is more important than the self. Granted, he is not my “perfect” candidate. All things being equal I would not choose him, but let’s face facts, all things aren’t equal. Sometimes, you find yourself on the ice as a college player facing professional players from another land who don’t have to worry about grades or making enough money at side jobs to stay in school. They play and practice every day and are all part of the Army, assigned to do nothing but play hockey and be very, very good at it.
Nobody would have faulted or criticized the 1980 team if they had lost to the Soviets. I imagine that afternoon, in the pre-game locker room, with butterflies and jitter, as they pulled on those sweaters they ran their fingers over the letters on the front – USA. Dressed and ready, they heard Herb Brook – a man who hated communism with a passion that so few of us can imagine – told them that their time had come, this was their day.
It was not easy, in so many was that game was a microcosm of the conflict history of our nation. Behind and facing defeat, but resilient and never say die. That game represented America and Americans in their best moments. That we never quit, that we always give 100% and that in the end, we are the best.
Watching Senator Obama at Saddleback and over the past few weeks, it’s clear that to him, the name on the back of the sweater is more important than the name on the front.
And it was refreshing as the bad taste of seeing that washed about our mouths, to hear from the Olympics again. Yes, Michael Phelps is great, yes the scullers are fantastic and the women’s soccer team is awesome. But for me, it was the moment when Kobe Bryant, an NBA MVP and NBA Champion, an athlete with really, nothing to prove and virtually nothing to gain, said that he got goosebumps when he was given his Team USA Olympic Uniform. He went on to say “went on to call the U.S. "the greatest country in the world. It has given us so many great opportunities, and it's just a sense of pride that you have; that you say, 'You know what? Our country is the best.'"
The name on the front of the jersey – USA is more important than the name on the back. How revitalizing that there are still those who get that.